We don’t know the whole story about the Penn State situation yet.   There is already an ethical question at the center of the issue:  who knew about the abuse and why didn’t they stop it?

We don’t have to be referring to the Penn State case to have a discussion on this ethical issue:  ethics vs. compliance. 

Compliance is doing what you are required to do by laws or rules.

Ethics is doing what you should do because it is right.

We can all probably think of a time when we had to choose between doing what was required or doing what was right.   What about doing what we could do versus what we should do?

  • What if  you saw your child cheating on homework?  Would you intervene or allow it?
  • How about seeing a co-worker steal office supplies?  Would you say something or allow it?
  • Did you ever see a friend get bullied?  Would you ask someone for help or  allow it?

Doing the right thing isn’t always easy.  The obstacles to good character are numerous.  We’ll talk a more about some of these obstacles in a post next week.  In the meantime, we’ll leave you with this popular quote:

What you permit, you promote.
What you allow, you encourage.
What you condone, you own.

 

 

 

 

 

Log in with Facebook to comment
This post isn’t really about Penn State
Tagged on:

One thought on “This post isn’t really about Penn State

  • October 22, 2015 at 8:31 pm
    Permalink

    Catchy title. You are such a great author, I really enjoy read your post. I would love to come browse through once more to read more post of yours

Comments are closed.